By Nancy Edwards
Proponents of the tax hike explained that revenue from the tax, estimated at 1.2 million dollars, would go toward reducing the town’s property tax and increasing economic development.
The majority of residents that expressed their opinion over the tax, however, questioned the lack of a specific plan over where the money would go.
“I want to express opposition to the endless stream of tax revenue without a specific agenda,” said Bill Smythe, owner of local restaurant, Claude & Annie’s.
Other citizens voiced their concern over an additional tax that, when combined with other taxes, adds up over time. They also questioned the potential use of other sources for bringing in economic development.
Several council members pointed out that other sources of funding are not available due to extra town expenditures such as 911 calls, which cost $800,000 per year.
Council member Renee Cox delivered a short speech expressing her opposition to the tax for Fishers families and businesses.
“I’m not interested in the tax for the little amount gained for economic development,” she said. “People are sick and tired of being used as the government’s ATM machine.”
Several council members, including Scott Faultless, questioned Cox’s motive for disagreeing with the tax.
“It’s one thing to say you are opposed to the tax while running for mayor,” Faultless said. “Roughly two years ago you (Cox) wanted to pass (the referendum).”
Kurt Meyer, president-elect of the Fishers Chamber of Commerce, is in favor of the tax. Meyer said he is in support of the tax because the revenue is needed to compete with neighboring cities to bring in new jobs.
“I accept the Chamber’s position to keep economic development running,” he said.
Kelly Novak, also representing the Chamber of Commerce, added that the tax is needed to support a “flourishing community.”
“It’s important to the town, business owners and community,” she said.
A second public hearing occurred yesterday. The council will vote on the tax on Dec. 2.